Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Versus Sony 16-55mm f/2.8 G: Which Is the

Tamron made waves a few years ago with its 28-75mm f/2.8 lens for Sony full frame cameras. Now there’s an APS-C version and it might make the equivalent Sony lens look massively overpriced. How good is the Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 for Sony crop-sensor cameras? Tamron announced the its new 17-70mm f/2.8 late last year and those lucky enough to get their hands on it seem to be very impressed. In this detailed video, Arthur R puts it head-to-head with Sony’s own APS-C workhorse, the 16-55mm f/2.8 G. At $1,298, the Sony is dramatically more expensive than the Tamron which costs a mere $799.

Positioned as the workhorse lens for APS-C, the Sony E 16-55mm f/2.8 G is a flexible wide-angle to portrait-length zoom featuring a bright constant

Sony E 16-55mm f/2.8 G Lens

Tamron 17-70mm F2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Review

Tamron 17-70mm F/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD review - Amateur Photographer

My Sony E 16-55mm f/2.8 G Lens Review – SonyAlphaLab

Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD APS-C E-Mount Lens Available for Pre-Order

Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 vs Sony/Zeiss 16-35mm f/4 - Admiring Light

Tamron 17-70mm F/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD (Model B070) Review

Ultimate aps-c setup? : r/SonyAlpha

F2.8 Standard Zoom Lenses for Sony APS-C Cameras Size Comparison: Sony 16-55 vs Tamron 17-70 vs Sigma 18-50

Tamron 17-70mm f2.8 Review (vs Sony 16-55mm f2.8 G)

Tamron 17-70mm F/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD review - Amateur Photographer